Wheatstone bridge

A Wheatstone bridge is an electrical circuit used to measure an unknown electrical resistance by balancing two legs of a bridge circuit, one leg of which includes the unknown component. Its operation is similar to the original potentiometer. It was invented by Samuel Hunter Christie in 1833 and improved and popularized by Sir Charles Wheatstone in 1843. [1]

Contents

Operation

In the figure, R_x is the unknown resistance to be measured; R_1, R_2 and R_3 are resistors of known resistance and the resistance of R_2 is adjustable. If the ratio of the two resistances in the known leg (R_2 / R_1) is equal to the ratio of the two in the unknown leg (R_x / R_3), then the voltage between the two midpoints (B and D) will be zero and no current will flow through the galvanometer V_g. If the bridge is unbalanced, the direction of the current indicates whether R_2 is too high or too low. R_2 is varied until there is no current through the galvanometer, which then reads zero.

Detecting zero current with a galvanometer can be done to extremely high accuracy. Therefore, if R_1, R_2 and R_3 are known to high precision, then R_x can be measured to high precision. Very small changes in R_x disrupt the balance and are readily detected.

At the point of balance, the ratio of R_2 / R_1 = R_x / R_3

Therefore,  R_x = (R_2 / R_1) \cdot R_3

Alternatively, if R_1, R_2, and R_3 are known, but R_2 is not adjustable, the voltage difference across or current flow through the meter can be used to calculate the value of R_x, using Kirchhoff's circuit laws (also known as Kirchhoff's rules). This setup is frequently used in strain gauge and resistance thermometer measurements, as it is usually faster to read a voltage level off a meter than to adjust a resistance to zero the voltage.

Derivation

First, Kirchhoff's first rule is used to find the currents in junctions B and D:

I_3 \ - I_x \ %2B I_G = 0
I_1 \ - I_2 \ - I_G = 0

Then, Kirchhoff's second rule is used for finding the voltage in the loops ABD and BCD:

(I_3 \cdot R_3) - (I_G \cdot R_G) - (I_1 \cdot R_1) = 0
(I_x \cdot R_x) - (I_2 \cdot R_2) %2B (I_G \cdot R_G) = 0

The bridge is balanced and I_G = 0, so the second set of equations can be rewritten as:

I_3 \cdot R_3 = I_1 \cdot R_1
I_x \cdot R_x = I_2 \cdot R_2

Then, the equations are divided and rearranged, giving:

R_x = {{R_2 \cdot I_2 \cdot I_3 \cdot R_3}\over{R_1 \cdot I_1 \cdot I_x}}

From the first rule, I_3 = I_x and I_1 = I_2. The desired value of R_x is now known to be given as:

R_x = {{R_3 \cdot R_2}\over{R_1}}

If all four resistor values and the supply voltage (V_S) are known, and the resistance of the galvanometer is high enough that I_G is negligible, the voltage across the bridge (V_G) can be found by working out the voltage from each potential divider and subtracting one from the other. The equation for this is:

V_G = {{R_x}\over{R_3 %2B R_x}}V_s - {{R_2}\over{R_1 %2B R_2}}V_s

This can be simplified to:

V_G = \left({{R_x}\over{R_3 %2B R_x}} - {{R_2}\over{R_1 %2B R_2}}\right)V_s

where V_G is the voltage of node B relative to node D.

Significance

The Wheatstone bridge illustrates the concept of a difference measurement, which can be extremely accurate. Variations on the Wheatstone bridge can be used to measure capacitance, inductance, impedance and other quantities, such as the amount of combustible gases in a sample, with an explosimeter. The Kelvin bridge was specially adapted from the Wheatstone bridge for measuring very low resistances. In many cases, the significance of measuring the unknown resistance is related to measuring the impact of some physical phenomenon - such as force, temperature, pressure, etc. - which thereby allows the use of Wheatstone bridge in measuring those elements indirectly.

The concept was extended to alternating current measurements by James Clerk Maxwell in 1865 and further improved by Alan Blumlein in about 1926.

Modifications of the fundamental bridge

The Wheatstone bridge is the fundamental bridge, but there are other modifications that can be made to measure various kinds of resistances when the fundamental Wheatstone bridge is not suitable. Some of the modifications are:

See also

References

  1. ^ "The Genesis of the Wheatstone Bridge" by Stig Ekelof discusses Christie's and Wheatstone's contributions, and why the bridge carries Wheatstone's name. Published in "Engineering Science and Education Journal", volume 10, no 1, February 2001, pages 37 - 40.

External links